Purchasing Process Audit and Problem-Solving Tips

Key takeaways:

• Execute a structured 10-step audit process that includes defining objectives, gathering documentation, assessing internal controls, reviewing compliance, analyzing vendor management, and continuously monitoring implementation of recommendations.

• Prioritize audit findings by business impact and assign clear ownership with deadlines for corrective actions, tracking measurable outcomes like cost savings and time reductions to demonstrate tangible value to leadership.

• Implement a contract lifecycle management platform as your central repository to replace spreadsheet-based tracking, enabling effective auditing through searchable documentation, automated compliance monitoring, and centralized spending analysis.

• Treat auditing as a continuous improvement cycle by conducting regular reviews annually or more frequently for high-risk organizations, and embed learnings into updated contract templates, approval workflows, and system controls.

Have you ever stared at a vendor invoice that doesn’t quite match what you thought you agreed to? Or discovered a contract that expired months ago, with no one tracking the renewal? These scenarios happen more often than anyone wants to admit, which is why a recent PwC survey found that nearly half of internal audit functions now address supply chain disruption in their audit plans. It’s exactly why smart procurement teams are turning to purchasing process audits.

Auditing your purchasing process isn’t just about checking boxes for compliance—though that’s important. It’s about uncovering the hidden inefficiencies, overlooked risks, and missed opportunities that are quietly draining your budget and slowing down your operations. The best part? Most of these problems are completely fixable once you know where to look.

What a purchasing process audit entails

A purchasing process audit is a systematic examination of your organization’s procurement activities to assess effectiveness, efficiency, and compliance with policies and regulations. This structured review identifies strengths, weaknesses, and improvement opportunities across your entire purchasing operation.

Here’s how it works in practice. The audit process involves three key components. First, documentation review examines your procurement policies, procedures, and transaction records. Second, personnel interviews gather insights from team members involved in purchasing decisions. Third, data analysis evaluates vendor selection, contract management, and financial controls to uncover patterns and risks.

The audit findings provide valuable insights into the purchasing process’s performance, identify potential risks or inefficiencies, and help your company implement corrective actions that improve procurement practices and ensure compliance with internal and external requirements.

Who should perform the audit?

Most purchasing process audits are performed by internal audit departments, dedicated compliance teams, or cross-functional groups combining procurement and finance expertise. The right choice for your organization depends on company size, available resources, and the independence level you need.

• Internal staff: Utilize existing staff members who have a good understanding of the organization’s purchasing processes. This could include individuals from the finance or operations departments who have experience and knowledge of procurement activities. They can be assigned the responsibility of conducting the internal audit alongside their regular duties.
• Internal audit department: Some organizations have an internal audit department or team dedicated to conducting independent and objective audits across different functions, including procurement. This department typically consists of internal auditors who are trained in auditing practices, risk assessment, and control evaluation.
• Procurement or purchasing team: In some organizations, the procurement or purchasing team may have individuals with expertise in auditing or compliance. These individuals can be assigned the responsibility of conducting internal audits of your purchasing processes, leveraging their knowledge of the procurement function and its associated risks.
• Compliance department: Organizations with a dedicated compliance department may have professionals who possess the skills and knowledge necessary to audit your purchasing process. They can assess compliance with policies, procedures, and relevant regulations, ensuring that procurement activities adhere to ethical and legal standards.
• Cross-functional audit team: Another approach is to establish a cross-functional audit team that comprises representatives from different departments, including procurement, finance, legal, and internal audit. This team brings diverse perspectives and expertise to the audit process, allowing for a comprehensive evaluation of your purchasing process.
• External audit firm: Some organizations engage external audit firms or consultants to perform independent audits of their processes. These external auditors bring objectivity and specialized expertise, providing an unbiased assessment of the procurement function.

No matter which route you choose, successful audits require expertise in procurement principles and regulations. If your internal team lacks this background, consider engaging external auditors who can provide thorough, unbiased evaluations.

The key is finding people who have the necessary knowledge and skills to effectively evaluate your purchasing processes and provide valuable insights and recommendations for improvement. Even if you’re working with limited resources, an informal audit can help uncover opportunities for improvement.

Before you begin, consult with management to evaluate the audit’s specific requirements and select the best approach for your company’s resources and goals.

Purchasing process audit steps

A purchasing process audit evaluates how well your procurement activities meet organizational goals while maintaining compliance and efficiency. The audit follows a structured 10-step approach that moves from planning through implementation of improvements.

1. Define audit objectives. Clearly define the objectives and scope of the audit. Identify the specific areas and processes within the purchasing function that will be audited. Determine the goals of the audit, such as identifying control weaknesses, assessing compliance with policies and regulations, or identifying opportunities for process improvement.
2. Develop an audit plan. Create a detailed audit plan that outlines the audit methodology, timelines, and resources required. Determine the audit procedures to be followed, including data collection methods, interviews with relevant personnel, and documentation review.
3. Gather relevant information. Collect all relevant documentation related to the purchasing process, such as policies, procedures, contracts, purchase orders, invoices, and vendor records. Review and analyze these documents to gain an understanding of the current purchasing practices and identify potential areas of risk or non-compliance.
4. Assess internal controls. Evaluate the effectiveness of internal controls within the purchasing process. This includes reviewing the segregation of duties, authorization procedures, invoice and payment verification processes, contract management practices, and adherence to procurement policies and procedures. Identify any control weaknesses or gaps that may exist.
5. Review compliance. Assess compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and organizational policies. Ensure that purchasing activities adhere to legal requirements, ethical standards, and internal policies. Evaluate whether proper procurement procedures are followed, competitive bidding processes are conducted when necessary, and conflicts of interest are appropriately addressed.
6. Analyze vendor management. Review vendor selection, evaluation, and management processes. Evaluate the adequacy of vendor qualification criteria, contract management practices, and performance monitoring mechanisms. Assess whether vendors are selected based on objective criteria, contracts are appropriately negotiated, and vendor performance is regularly reviewed.
7. Identify risks and opportunities. Identify and assess risks associated with the purchasing process. Determine potential risks such as fraud, unauthorized purchases, non-compliance, or inefficient processes. Identify opportunities for process improvement, cost savings, or enhanced vendor relationships.
8. Report findings and recommendations. Prepare a comprehensive audit report that summarizes the findings of the audit. Clearly communicate any control weaknesses, non-compliance issues, or areas of improvement. Provide actionable recommendations to address the identified issues and enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of the purchasing process.
9. Follow up and monitor. Monitor the implementation of audit recommendations and track progress over time. Conduct follow-up audits to assess the effectiveness of corrective actions taken and verify compliance with recommended changes. Continuously monitor the purchasing process to ensure ongoing compliance and improvement.
10. Communicate results. Share the audit findings, recommendations, and any resulting changes with relevant stakeholders, including management, procurement personnel, and other departments affected by the purchasing process. Promote transparency and ensure awareness of the audit results to drive accountability and continuous improvement.

Purchasing process problems and how to solve them

Purchasing process audits consistently reveal eight common problems that create risk and inefficiency across organizations. These findings range from documentation gaps to compliance issues, each with specific solutions that strengthen your procurement operations.

Lack of documentation

Lack of documentation occurs when purchasing records are missing, incomplete, or inconsistent across your procurement process. This creates transparency gaps and accountability risks that can lead to compliance violations and operational inefficiencies.

Common documentation problems include missing purchase orders, incomplete vendor records, and inadequate contract files. These gaps make it difficult to track spending, verify compliance, and resolve disputes when they arise.

Suggestions:

• Establish clear documentation requirements and provide training to procurement personnel on proper record-keeping practices.

• Implement a centralized electronic system or procurement software to streamline document management and centralize all purchasing activity for easy access to essential records.

• Develop standardized templates and forms for purchase orders, vendor records, and contract documentation to maintain consistency and completeness.

Weak internal controls

The audit may reveal weaknesses in internal controls, such as inadequate segregation of duties, inconsistent authorization processes, or lack of verification procedures for invoices and payments. These findings emphasize the importance of strengthening internal controls to prevent fraud, errors, and unauthorized purchases, especially since publicly traded companies are required to have robust internal controls and validate them in annual financial reports.

Suggestions:

• Strengthen segregation of duties by clearly defining roles and responsibilities within the purchasing process.

• Implement authorization controls, such as defined approval workflows and limits for various purchasing activities.

• Conduct regular reviews and reconciliations of invoices, purchase agreements, and payments to detect errors or discrepancies.

• Introduce periodic internal audits or self-assessment processes to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of internal controls.

Non-compliance with policies and regulations

Auditors may identify instances where the purchasing process deviates from established policies, procedures, or regulatory requirements. This finding highlights the need to improve compliance and ensure adherence to applicable laws, ethical standards, and organizational guidelines.

Suggestions:

• Review and update procurement policies and procedures to align with relevant laws, regulations, and industry best practices.

• Provide comprehensive training and awareness programs to ensure that procurement personnel understand and comply with the established policies.

• Implement robust monitoring and oversight mechanisms to detect and address any instances of non-compliance.

• Foster a culture of ethical conduct and integrity throughout the procurement function.

Inefficient supplier management

The audit may uncover inefficiencies in supplier management, such as poor vendor selection practices, inadequate performance monitoring, or missed opportunities for cost savings through strategic sourcing. These findings emphasize the need to enhance supplier relationship management, which can lead to better pricing, improved service, and reduced supply chain risks.

Suggestions:

• Develop a structured supplier qualification and selection process based on defined criteria, such as quality, price, reliability, and sustainability.

• Establish key performance indicators (KPIs) to evaluate supplier performance and regularly assess their adherence to contractual obligations.

• Implement contract management systems or software to ensure timely renewals, amendments, and proper oversight of supplier contracts.

• Foster open communication and collaboration with suppliers to drive continuous improvement and identify cost-saving opportunities by proactively uncovering blind spots in your supplier agreements.

Inadequate contract management

Auditors may identify issues in contract management, such as expired contracts, inconsistent terms and conditions, or missed opportunities for contract renegotiation. This finding underscores the importance of robust contract management processes to ensure favorable terms, protect the organization’s interests, and strengthen vendor partnerships. The value of modernizing this area is clear, as a recent survey found that 80% of procurement teams use AI during contracting and rate its impact at an average of 8.24 out of 10, according to The State of AI in Procurement 2025 Report.

Suggestions:

• Implement a centralized contract repository or contract management system to facilitate easy access, tracking, and renewal management.

• Conduct periodic contract reviews to ensure compliance with terms and conditions and identify opportunities for renegotiation or cost optimization.

• Assign contract owners or managers to oversee contract administration and monitor key milestones, deliverables, and obligations.

• Establish robust processes for contract approval, amendment, and termination to ensure compliance and mitigate risks.

Limited competitive bidding

The audit may reveal instances where competitive bidding processes aren’t adequately followed, resulting in missed opportunities for cost savings and supplier diversification. This finding emphasizes the need to promote fair competition and explore multiple vendor options to secure more favorable pricing and terms. As procurement technology evolves, the opportunity cost of manual processes grows; Gartner estimates that 25% of all sourcing events will run fully autonomously by 2027, according to the GenAI for Enterprise Procurement Teams Guide.

Suggestions:

• Develop clear guidelines and thresholds for when competitive bidding processes should be followed.

• Implement an automated system for requests for proposal (RFPs) or requests for quotation (RFQs) to streamline the bidding process.

• Encourage supplier diversification by actively seeking new vendor relationships and periodically reviewing existing supplier agreements.

• Conduct market research and benchmarking to ensure competitiveness and secure favorable pricing and terms.

Poor inventory management

Auditors may find discrepancies or inefficiencies in inventory management related to purchasing activities, such as stockouts, excess inventory, or inadequate controls over inventory replenishment. This finding highlights the need to improve inventory management practices, forecasting, and demand planning to free up working capital and minimize stock-related risks. For example, one packaged-foods manufacturer was able to reduce lost sales from stockouts by 20% after improving its processes.

Suggestions:

• Implement inventory management systems or software to track inventory levels, demand patterns, and reorder points.

• Conduct regular inventory audits to identify and address stock discrepancies, obsolete items, and overstock situations.

• Improve demand forecasting and planning processes to better align inventory with demand and minimize stockouts.

• Establish effective communication channels between procurement and inventory management teams to ensure alignment and timely replenishment.

Non-compliance with sustainability or social responsibility standards

The audit may uncover non-compliance with sustainability or social responsibility standards in the purchasing process, such as sourcing from unethical suppliers or neglecting environmental considerations. This finding emphasizes the need to align procurement practices with sustainable and ethical guidelines to fulfill corporate social responsibility commitments. Research shows this alignment is effective; one study found that altering the selection criteria in procurement increased the use of environmental materials by 20 percentage points.

Suggestions:

• Develop and communicate clear guidelines and criteria for sustainable and socially responsible procurement practices.

• Implement supplier qualification processes that include assessments of their sustainability and ethical practices.

• Collaborate with suppliers to improve sustainability performance, such as reducing carbon footprint or promoting fair labor practices.

• Regularly review and update supplier contracts to include sustainability requirements and compliance monitoring.

Addressing the problems identified during a purchasing process audit requires a proactive approach to implement corrective actions. Of course, the specific audit findings will vary depending on the organization, industry, and specific audit objectives. Solutions should be tailored to the specific findings and needs of your organization. It’s important to involve relevant stakeholders, such as procurement personnel, legal advisors, and senior management, to ensure effective implementation and continuous improvement of the process.

Best practices for purchasing process audits

A successful audit is more than a checklist exercise. To ensure it delivers real value, it’s important to approach the process strategically. Here are some best practices that help turn an audit from a requirement into a driver of improvement.

• Start with clear goals. Don’t just audit for the sake of it. What are you actually trying to fix? Are you trying to cut costs, speed up procurement cycles, or reduce risk? Tie your audit directly to a business problem. If you can’t explain to your CFO why you’re doing it in one sentence, you’re not ready.

• Get buy-in from the right people. This isn’t just a procurement or legal project. The teams actually making the purchases and the finance team that pays the bills need to be on board. If teams see the audit as an obstacle, gaining adoption for your findings will be challenging—a real risk, since studies show that just over half of internal audit functions show strong alignment with other business departments on key risks. Explain what’s in it for them—less friction, faster approvals, clearer processes.

• Use the right tools. Trying to audit a purchasing process using only spreadsheets and shared drives is inefficient and prone to error. You need a single source of truth. A good CLM platform gives you a central repository for all your contracts and data, so you can actually analyze what’s going on instead of just hunting for documents.

• Focus on communication. Don’t disappear for a month and then drop a 50-page report on everyone’s desk. Keep stakeholders in the loop. Share early findings, ask questions, and make it a collaborative process. People are much more likely to accept the results if they feel like they were part of the process.

• Make it a continuous process. An audit isn’t a one-and-done thing. Your business is always changing, and so are your processes. Think of it as a regular health check. The most effective teams treat auditing as a continuous improvement cycle, not a fire drill they run every two years.

Test your own contract processes

Turning audit insights into procurement excellence

A purchasing process audit transforms procurement from a reactive function into a strategic advantage. The structured evaluation reveals inefficiencies, strengthens compliance, and uncovers cost-saving opportunities that directly impact your bottom line.

Organizations that implement audit recommendations typically see reduced costs, faster processing times, and stronger regulatory compliance. For example, after conducting a full assessment of its energy-sourcing strategy, one global producer created a plan to reduce costs by 20% and CO2 emissions by over 30%.

But here’s the thing about audit findings—they don’t mean anything if you don’t act on them. First, you have to prioritize. Your audit will probably uncover a dozen different issues. You can’t fix them all at once. Figure out what’s most important. What poses the biggest risk? Where can you get the quickest win or the biggest cost savings? Focus your energy there.

Next, create a real action plan. For each finding, assign an owner, set a deadline, and define what ‘done’ looks like. Without clear accountability, that audit report is just going to collect dust.

And here’s the most important part: show the value. Track the improvements you make and report back to leadership. Don’t just say, ‘We fixed the process.’ Say, ‘We implemented the audit’s recommendation to standardize our vendor payment terms, and it’s projected to save us $50,000 this year.’ That’s how you get the resources to keep improving.

Finally, build your learnings back into your systems. If you’re using a CLM, this is where it really pays off. Update your contract templates, adjust your approval workflows, and refine your reporting dashboards based on what you learned. This turns a one-time finding into a permanent improvement.

Modern contract management systems can automate many audit recommendations, from centralized documentation to automated compliance tracking. Request a demo today to see how technology can turn your audit insights into lasting procurement improvements.

Frequently asked questions about purchasing process audits

How often should we conduct purchasing process audits?

It really depends on your company’s size and complexity. For most, doing a full audit annually is a good baseline. If you’re in a high-growth phase, dealing with a merger, or in a heavily regulated industry, you might want to do it more frequently, maybe every six months. The key is not to let it go for too long, or you’ll be dealing with a much bigger mess.

What technology tools can help with purchasing audits?

Trying to do this with email and spreadsheets is a recipe for failure. The single most important tool is a contract lifecycle management (CLM) platform. It gives you a centralized, searchable repository for all your agreements and the data inside them. This is your source of truth. Without it, you’re just guessing. A good CLM helps you track obligations, analyze spending, and see where your process is breaking down.

How long does a typical purchasing audit take?

That’s a ‘how long is a piece of string’ question. It depends on the scope. A quick audit of a single process, like your NDA workflow, might only take a couple of weeks. A deep dive into your entire procure-to-pay process at a large company could take several months. The biggest factor is how organized your data is. If everything is already in a CLM, it’s much faster than if you have to dig through file cabinets and inboxes.

What qualifications should internal auditors have?

You need someone who’s objective and detail-oriented. They should understand both procurement principles and basic auditing standards. It doesn’t have to be a certified auditor, especially for an internal review. Sometimes the best person is a legal ops or finance pro who has a knack for process improvement and isn’t afraid to ask tough questions. The most important thing is that they have the independence to report their findings without fear of pushback.

How do we measure the ROI of our audit efforts?

This is crucial for getting continued support from leadership. You can measure it in a few ways. There are hard savings, like cost reductions from renegotiating contracts or eliminating maverick spend. Then there are soft savings, like the time your team saves from a more efficient process. You can also track risk reduction, like improved compliance rates. The key is to tie your findings to tangible business outcomes—dollars saved, hours reclaimed, and risks avoided.

---

Ironclad is not a law firm, and this post does not constitute or contain legal advice. To evaluate the accuracy, sufficiency, or reliability of the ideas and guidance reflected here, or the applicability of these materials to your business, you should consult with a licensed attorney. Use of and access to any of the resources contained within Ironclad’s site do not create an attorney-client relationship between the user and Ironclad.